[This post may end up living here, but since these thoughts are so tied-up in my work-life, I'm publishing on Best Available, as well. At least for now.]
Divergence is the Problem. The problem is not that I’m THIS way or THAT way, but rather, it is INCONGRUENCE between the hopes I have for myself and my actual behavior, that is at issue, here.
I have always heard that when it comes to having and wanting, that a person should want what they have, rather than have what they want. Actually, both sides hold merit for me, but being able to see both sides only further complicates the issue. There are only two options, if I am to attempt to narrow the gap between what I WANT for myself and what I actually DO in my life:
1) WANT LESS BY BEING HAPPY WITH THE STATUS QUO
At first glance, the ideas of being at peace with circumstances and being more accepting of who I actually am, feel like very sound advice. As if the counsel came straight from Miyagi or Master Oogway. Possession of those perspectives would promote inner harmony and quell the dust storm in my head.
But then I think about the people whom I admire, and how they push themselves beyond their limits and always accomplish more than they set out to do. How can I affect change if I’m okay with the way things are? I feel like I’m chasing my tail, here.
The other option, to close the gap between intention and reality, is to:
2) CHANGE MY BEHAVIOR
Well, here’s where the discussion comes to a grinding halt, because if I could change my behavior to be more what I want it to be, there would be no issue.
So we’re back to the first thing.
WANTING LESS
The unfulfilled desire for... whatever it is. You fill-in-the-blank. Any Buddhist will tell you that a person needs to examine their lives without judgment. That an exploration of the root of a person’s behavior should be done from the standpoint of curiosity. Okay. Perhaps “acceptance of the status quo” is the wrong phrase, then, if I still want change to be the end result. How do you ponder the discrepancy between action and intention without having an opinion about it? Or is having an opinion and having a judgment two different things? Maybe what I’m talking about is the difference between a cerebral examination versus an instinctual, emotional one. Answer the curiosity. Why do I do that? Why DON’T I do that? Really. Which answers to those questions make sense?
LURKING SEMANTICS
Perhaps there is a lurking variable muddying the waters, here. If I use the word “intention” as a straight substitute for “desire,” then I am assuming they are synonymous. However, it is clear that, more often than not, THIS is where the disconnect actually happens: between what we TRULY WANT and that on which we INTEND TO ACT.
Hmmm. Deep. Better crack out a Buddhism 101 textbook and study this a bit. I’m feeling slightly over my head in these pondrances. I know a few good friends who might have some wisdom on this, in the comments section.
In the meantime, I’m never one to say that there’s only one way to skin a cat (what a terrible saying!). So, whilst I chew on the problem of reducing my desire for change, while still retaining the intention of change, there still exists the best advice I’ve been given yet, where this is concerned:
ASSUME THE POSITION
I originally learned this when I was a directing student at a local playhouse. This method is a way for an actor to get closer to the truth of a character, when they’re “just not feeling it.” Assume the position, even though you’re not inspired. You may just surprise yourself and find that the inspiration comes only AFTER the posturing. Rehearse in the correct shoes. Put a pebble in one of them to remind you what your character’s bad ankle feels like every time you put pressure on it. Sit the way your character would sit after hearing such terrible news... Assume the position, the acting will come.
I’ve seen this idea work in real life, as well. For example: I want to be a person who practices yoga regularly. What does a person who does yoga have? What do they wear? What do they know? Start there. The doing will follow. I may not do yoga every time I put on my yoga clothes, but there is a higher likelihood that I will, if I do. I may not end up GOING to a class, but if I research the schedule, there’s a much better chance that I might. I should be okay with taking those steps that I DID take. Those are good things that are not diminished, just because I didn’t end up actually practicing yoga today.
Of course, if your vision for your life is quite different from the life you currently lead, the idea of assuming the position might feel overwhelming and downright impossible, should so many changes be attempted all at once. That’s where priorities and baby steps come in. Let’s not try to change the world all at once. Just pick up your own trash. That’s a start.
That’s where my Approximation Epiphany comes in.
APPROXIMATION—MOVIE MAKING AS PARADIGM
In April of last year, I wrote Adventures #33—wherein I discovered that the moviemaking process is a great life-lesson, owing to the fact that—in the most rudimentary fashion—we rough out what we hope to get in the end, and then week after week, we keep replacing parts with new bits that are closer to the director’s intended final product... until we have the real thing. I won’t repeat the whole post here, but it had a lot to do with our practice of generating moving, editorial cuts from static storyboards and later, from previzzed shots.
Tying in with the whole approximation theme, or maybe as a means of illustration on the point, is the concept of Potato-heading that I shared with you in Adventures #44—wherein a 3D model can be effectively modified by replacing distinctive aspects with slightly modified ones. The core of the model is still the same, but it begins to look different when this is done. And that’s a start.
HAPPINESS
This post began as contemplation on happiness—or rather: the resultant unhappiness that comes from wanting something to be different. The idea of change, and how so many people are consumed their whole lives with wanting life to be different than what it is.
As a big proponent of growth, enlightenment, and evolution, I seek to encourage change rather than stifle it. But for most people (including myself), the unfamiliar is a source of at least SOME anxiety. Change is uncomfortable. And hard. We had no choice about it, as we grew up from childhood, through adolescence and into adulthood. But that change is foisted upon us by nature. It’s inevitable and out of our hands.
It’s how to perpetuate that journey throughout adulthood that is at issue. How to embrace an evolving world and how to adapt with it. How to reach your goals before you blink and realize you’re 10 years older and not any farther along in your life.
Personally, I think the answer may lie in a self-fulfilling prophecy—a chicken-and-egg issue, having something to do with happiness... With being happy and having well-being. I think somewhere in the mystery of accepting current circumstances without judgment, with loving yourself just as you are, there will be enough momentum in the wisdom of that moment to propel you forward... to assume the position, swap out one tiny potatohead part, and take one baby step at a time.
Here’s to happiness... and here’s to change.
.













